All,
After hearing so much about this book I bought a hardcover used copy yesterday. I will admit to not yet reading it through but I have to say that, after looking up references to the one area I can reasonably be considered an expert on (the Duff Gordons), I will not be reading it through any time soon.(Just in turning a few pages I noticed the error in spelling of Lord Mersey's name as "Mercey" and Mrs. Cardeza being called "Lady Cardeza.")
These oversights are minor compared to the mistakes - and in some cases, outright fabrications - which I found in examining the passages dealing with the Duff Gordons and the situation of Boat 1. Now, though I'm glad the author shares my sympathy to some extent with the notorious couple this is really irrelevant as he is so wrong on so many aspects, both small and large, that I couldn't care less what he thinks. I realize the Duff Gordon "episode" is but one part of the Titanic story but I feel that if Pellegrino has made such errors in reporting it I wonder what other mistakes of greater consequence has he made elsewhere? I leave that to others to sort out.
On the Duff Gordons, though, may I point out first of all Pellegrino's mistake in constantly calling them the "Gordons," a minor error in conversation perhaps but on the printed page it's quite bad. Here, in order of their appearance in Pellegrino's account, are the errors re: Sir Cosmo and Lucy
Lady Duff Gordon:
1) P. 53n - Re: the silver jewellery box with the inscription of the initials "DG," supposedly recovered from the bag containing various passengers valuables. Pellegrino says that "with little doubt" this item belonged to the Duff Gordons. However there is no proof it was pilfered, as he suggests, from the couple's staterooms; moreover there is no real evidence to suggest it belonged to the couple in the first place. It might easily have belonged to "Dorothy Gibson" for instance.
2)P 145 - He says the "Gordons" (sic)at the Inquiry in London "completely retracted their story of panic and gunfire" aboard Titanic. The couple never stated officially anything about panic and gunfire so there could be no "retraction." The story of panic and gunfire was taken from an article printed in the NY American under Lucy Duff Gordon's name but without her approval or knowledge which she explained at length in her testimony.
3) P 145 - Pellegrino states "they (the D-Gs)...insisted on having no recollection of seeing William Murdoch near C (collapsible boat C)." The truth is they were never questioned re: Murdoch and may not even have known him by name anyhow. They were never questioned about Boat C either. Anyone can read the British Inquiry transcripts and see for themselves that no such question was put to them nor did they make any statement regarding Murdoch (by name) or Boat C.
4)P 145 -
Lady Duff Gordon's article was in the April 19 issue of the NY American, NOT the April 18 issue of the NY Sunday American. Easy mistakes perhaps but still sloppy research.
5) P 146n - Pellegrino does not make himself clear when he quotes Celiney Yasbeck's account. He indicates she was in boat 1 with the Duff Gordons, which she of course wasn't. Perhaps he means she was in a boat nearby. Still the reader is left to wonder. Again, sloppy.
6)P 146n - Lucy Duff Gordon's autobiography was published in 1932, not 1931.
7)P 179 - Pellegrino claims "Lady Gordon" (sic)heard from her lifeboat Peter Daly screaming "My God, My God" as the ship was beginning its final plunge. This is completely false. The "My God, My God" quote is taken from the bogus article in the American. Even in it, however, it is claimed this was heard well AFTER the ship sank. If she had heard a voice crying these words, Lucy Duff Gordon would not have known it was Peter Daly whom she certainly never met. It is a ludicrous story and shows how this author mixes and mingles bits and pieces into accounts he passes off as factual but in reality are totally contrived.
8)The conversation Pellegrino relates in which George Tulloch claims Lucy Duff Gordon saw one of those marconigrams mentioning icebergs which Ismay was showing people, must either be an invention of his own or based on some false account. I have never heard it claimed in any reputable source that Lucy Duff Gordon was ever approached at any time by Ismay. (Cosmo Duff Gordon, when asked in court whether they had met, said "not at any time in my life.") So Pellegrino is either making this bit up or he has been misled.
9)P 258 - As a costume historian this one really makes me laugh. Pellegrino absurdly claims that Lucy Duff Gordon was inspired to invent pockets in women's clothes after reading Helen Candee's account of Kent and the locket. Firstly I know of no evidence that Lucy ever read Helen Candee's story or even knew who she was. As to Lucy's making pockets, she certainly had more illustrious sources of inspiration in her designing. And for the record, Lucy and other women's wear designers had already discovered pockets by 1912!
10)P 142 - The quote from Mabel Francatelli (or "Franks") from a letter - still in private hands - which refers to Murdoch's suicide is taken completely out of context and shows that Pellegrino has manipulated the information in a most unethical way to support his view. Pellegrino's version of the quote - "He...poor dear brave fellow, shot himself. We saw the whole thing" - should actually read "The dear officer gave orders to row away from the sinking boat at least 200 hunderd yards, he afterwards poor dear brave fellow, shot himself. We saw the whole thing, and watched that tremendous boat quickly sink, there was then terrible terrible explosions and all darkness..." This full quote I have been given permission to use from a Francatelli relative who recently discovered a copy of the original which was sold through Sotheby's. To me it shows Franks was NOT referring to witnessing the shooting but rather to watching the sinking itself.
Well, I can only hope that other aspects of Pellegrino's "Ghosts of the Titanic" are more in line with the truth. I am not feeling much impressed at the moment and anyone who wants my copy (though annotated now in deepest red) may have it for the asking!
Randy
PS) I confess the front-cover art work for the dust jacket is nice.