Litosilo

I wondered if anyone could help enlighten me as to this deck covering, as there seem to have been worries about corrosion occuring on some of the larger liners? That is, there seem to have been issues where steel plating was in contact with this covering over a long period of time...I wonder if anyone could help remedy my ignorance as to what the trouble might have been?

Best wishes,

Mark.
 
I don't know quite where to go on this one. I found This Thread which mentioned Litosilo from a couple of years ago. From the gist of it, it looks to me like it was easily undermined by water. Enough so that such tiles used in the Turkish Bath were found anywhere but the Turkish bath. If this is the case, the issue to me as the sailor who has to deal with preservation and corrosion is that of salt water becoming trapped between the steel and the tile and eating nice holes in the deck. That and the pain in the rear about having to constantly replace tiles that were forever working themselves loose.
 
Thanks Michael. I'm rather ignorant as to the exact nature of Litosilo. With regard to the Turkish bath tiles, I think Bill Wormstedt's suggestion has merit. Thanks for the link.

I wish I could find the reference... I am wondering about Litosilo in light of some 1913 comments as to the need to inspect ships' steel decking where it was fitted. There seem to have been concerns about corrosion.

I don't have the specification to hand, otherwise I'd be able to check if Aquitania used Litosilo in this area, but there were these comments in a 1930s survey relating to this ship regarding corrosion on B-deck that was so serious that the half-inch plating had corroded through:

quote:

The deck plating is covered by a magnesite composition with ruboleum or similar covering on top. It is situated in passenger accommodation, dry and well protected. There is no reason to suppose that any water could gain access to the corroded portion. There is invariably some corrosion to the plating under magnesite compositions [was Litosilo such a thing?], particularly as laid at the time of this vessel's build [1913-14], and there was light-scale rust on the plating in the vicinity. There is, however, considerably heavier corrosion at the positions shown on the plan, which positions are observed to be adjacent to the ends of the thick corner doubling plates...

The survey goes on to speculate about 'stress corrosion,' but I am wondering as to the nature of Litosilo (as in the above quote). I note Parks' comments on the other thread as regards Veitchi being used on Britannic, which would seem to be an improvement on Titanic's design...we really need to know more about these two things: Litosilo and Veitchi.

Best wishes,

Mark.​
 
Hi Mark,

I would suspect that corrosion beneath this coating wasn't the fault of the coating per se, but was instead due to either faulty preparation of the steel deck plates prior to laying the Litosilo, which would be an application red lead primer and paint, or some sort of tar-based paint or coating, or from some undetected leakage finding its way beneath the flooring laid over top of the Litosilo. For anyone unfamiliar with Litosilo, it was a lightweight magnesite fairing, insulating and sound-deadening compound that was troweled over the steel deck plates and then floated smooth, providing an even surface over which linoleum, wood parquet, or rubber tiles were laid.

Litosilo was not a waterproof material, nor was it capable of providing a durable walking surface that could stand up to foot and other traffic, so it was always laid as the undercourse beneath linoleum or some other hard flooring, and was used only in compartments that weren't subject to anything more in the way of moisture than a good mopping. In bath rooms and WC's, and in spaces like the galleys, where the decks were expected to become wet at times, ceramic or porcelain tiles were laid down over a bedding of Portland cement, which was far more resistant to absorbing and holding moisture.

If there was a problem with corrosion being discovered beneath the Litosilo, I suspect that it was either due to this substance being used improperly -- laid beneath a bath room or deck pantry floor, for instance -- or because there was persistent leakage of water from some adjacent "wet" location finding its way beneath the flooring of a Litosilo-treated deck. Such sources of leakage could be improperly caulked bulkhead coamings and deck bars around galleys, lavatory compartments and deckhouses, or from improperly caulked gunwale bars or angles that bordered waterways present in certain lower deck areas. Water which found its way in through any such deficient caulking would eventually be absorbed by the Litosilo and, through capillary action, would spread out considerably past the point of leakage. Especially when you consider that sea water was used for deck-washing, bathing and sanitation purposes, the potential was always present to create a serious corrosion problem should this water find its way past the coamings which separated the "wet" spaces from the Litosilo-laid decks of the surrounding accommodation area.

Regards,
Scott Andrews
 
Dear Scott,

Many thanks for your very detailed posting regarding the Litosilo and the potential causes of corrosion. It would be interesting if there was any further information I could find as to whether or not they specifically traced the cause in the Aquitania's case...I'm not sure whether anything similar was reported prior to the 1938 survey above.

As I understand it, then, there could be problems with the deck being insufficiently prepared or there being leakage in these areas. I wonder if these were common problems on liners, as the reference I'd seen earlier did seem to imply that there was a problem with Litosilo itself, whereby liners that used it needed special attention paid to these areas.

Best wishes,

Mark.
 
Mark, I don't how useful it'll be but you can click on http://www.veitchi.com/introframe.html and try following the links at the bottom of the page.

From Scott's description of Litosilo itself, it doesn't sound to me like it's an idea material for flooring on a ship. Even in supposedly dry areas, you still have that potential for water leeching in, staying in, and doing some damage. Apparantly it was recognized as enough of a problem that something different was used on Britannic.
 
Back
Top