Kareen Healey
Member
Hello every one,
I was reading the testimony of Lightoller yesterday, questions 14009 to 14052 (British inquiry) and while thinking about a letter he had written to Murdoch's widow, something struck my mind : that latter could have been a lie.
Before telling you the reasons that have me saying that, let me just briefly explain few things about the way of making History a science :
In History, we work in the same way that police's detectives do, we interview witnesses... with the big difference that our witnesses are all dead. So through the years, a methodology has been build by few great historian, and one of them, maybe the most important, Marc Bloch (killed by the German during the Second World War, shot as a French Resistant) had found a way of getting nearer of the truth with the "external criticism" (regarding the medium of the sources, dates, handwriting, etc.) and "internal criticism", regarding the character by himself : who was he; his motivation to act as he did; his psychology; why could have been the reason to lie or not to lie; etc. For instance, that leads us to consider that maybe the book of Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz, written while he was waiting his trial, is also reliable as the one written by Albert Speer, Hitler's Architect and Minister of armament of the Third Reich, who was in jail, trial done, and who has nothing to hide for his life was not at stake as it was the case for Höss.
This is how History becomes a science just like psychology, sociology, biology, etc,
So after putting this in context, the point where I want to get is this one : I think that Lightoller lied in the letter he wrote to Ava Murdoch, the widow of the First Officer of the Titanic :
"(...) Having got my boat down off the top of the house, and there being no time to open it, I left it and ran across to the starboard side, still on top of the quarters. I was then practically looking down on your husband and his men. He was working hard, personally assisting, overhauling the forward boat’s fall. At this moment the ship dived, and we were all in the water (...)".
What makes me think that it was a lie ? Here's my arguments about it (and this is where I would like to have your comments and ideas : I'm not pretending to know everything (thought it could be fun to do so, but unfortunately, I am not as perfect, just a little bit! lol!
)
- No, no sign of the starboard side. You cannot see across.
"14048. And coming over to the starboard side on the roof of the Officers' quarters, could you see any other Officers?
- I saw the first Officer working at the falls of the starboard emergency boat, obviously with the intention of overhauling them and hooking on to the collapsible boat on their side.
14049. The other collapsible boat?
- Yes.
14050. That would be Mr. Murdoch?
- Yes.
14051. Were there others with him helping?
- There were a number round there helping.
14052. Then what happened?
- Well, she seemed to take a bit of a dive, and I just walked into the water
Thus I don't know what you all think about that, but for me, Lightoller lied to the widow (for a good reason, thought) and the truth is likely that nobody saw how Murdoch get drowned, unfortunately.
I was reading the testimony of Lightoller yesterday, questions 14009 to 14052 (British inquiry) and while thinking about a letter he had written to Murdoch's widow, something struck my mind : that latter could have been a lie.
Before telling you the reasons that have me saying that, let me just briefly explain few things about the way of making History a science :
In History, we work in the same way that police's detectives do, we interview witnesses... with the big difference that our witnesses are all dead. So through the years, a methodology has been build by few great historian, and one of them, maybe the most important, Marc Bloch (killed by the German during the Second World War, shot as a French Resistant) had found a way of getting nearer of the truth with the "external criticism" (regarding the medium of the sources, dates, handwriting, etc.) and "internal criticism", regarding the character by himself : who was he; his motivation to act as he did; his psychology; why could have been the reason to lie or not to lie; etc. For instance, that leads us to consider that maybe the book of Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz, written while he was waiting his trial, is also reliable as the one written by Albert Speer, Hitler's Architect and Minister of armament of the Third Reich, who was in jail, trial done, and who has nothing to hide for his life was not at stake as it was the case for Höss.
This is how History becomes a science just like psychology, sociology, biology, etc,
So after putting this in context, the point where I want to get is this one : I think that Lightoller lied in the letter he wrote to Ava Murdoch, the widow of the First Officer of the Titanic :
"(...) Having got my boat down off the top of the house, and there being no time to open it, I left it and ran across to the starboard side, still on top of the quarters. I was then practically looking down on your husband and his men. He was working hard, personally assisting, overhauling the forward boat’s fall. At this moment the ship dived, and we were all in the water (...)".
What makes me think that it was a lie ? Here's my arguments about it (and this is where I would like to have your comments and ideas : I'm not pretending to know everything (thought it could be fun to do so, but unfortunately, I am not as perfect, just a little bit! lol!
- First of all, he said in his testimony at the British Inquiry that from the top of the officer's quarters, he didn't saw the other side of the ship
- No, no sign of the starboard side. You cannot see across.
- Second, if he had actually seen the end of Murdoch, he would have mention it to the General Attorney while he was talking about Murdoch and the fact that he went to see on the starboard side of the ship to see if they need him for the boat left to lowered near the end.
"14048. And coming over to the starboard side on the roof of the Officers' quarters, could you see any other Officers?
- I saw the first Officer working at the falls of the starboard emergency boat, obviously with the intention of overhauling them and hooking on to the collapsible boat on their side.
14049. The other collapsible boat?
- Yes.
14050. That would be Mr. Murdoch?
- Yes.
14051. Were there others with him helping?
- There were a number round there helping.
14052. Then what happened?
- Well, she seemed to take a bit of a dive, and I just walked into the water
- Third, we have to ask ourselves what could have been the reasons for the man to lie in this letter. And the answer is quite obvious : to comfort the afflicted widow for the headlines then were talking about the presumed "Murdoch's suicide" (We know now since 2002 from a letter found by the nephew of Wilde that it is most probably him that killed himself onboard of the Titanic, even if that have to be taken with a grain of salt, but as far as I'm concerned, I think that this theory is not far from the truth. But this is not the point here) and Lightoller certainly thought that something has to be done to help Ava Murdoch, and we could not blame him for that, even if by doing that, he messed up with History and get Historian's job more difficult, as if that was not enough messy like that!!
.
Thus I don't know what you all think about that, but for me, Lightoller lied to the widow (for a good reason, thought) and the truth is likely that nobody saw how Murdoch get drowned, unfortunately.