Mark Chirnside
Member
I thought that it would be interesting to post this information, I was off the board for two weeks and have not read any threads yet. Phil told me that my Olympic article had been accessed 12,000 times which astonished and pleased me.
I got off a train from Liverpool yesterday, with astonishing new information that I hope to share as time permits. It included plans of Cunard to refit Olympic by July 1935 for cruising, proving that even Cunard it seems did not see her scrapping at that date as mandatory. I also researched every maintainence cost, from victualling, oil, wages, deck repair, etc. From 1933, Olympic was the cheapest of the Big Six to run except Homeric and possibly Mauretania. I am able to expand even more on my article in my Olympic work which I was really pleased with.
I know that David G. Brown among others has mentioned his belief of the poor design of the Firemen's staircase and tunnel. Yet, in 1911 one expert slated it as being too small!
It is from a nautical Cunard observer who, on June 1st 1911, walked aboard and was astonished by the enormous engine room. He had many praises for the machinery and features, but wasn't impressed with the passenger accommodation.
But, assuming the 'flawed design' theory of the tunnel is right, what on earth would have happened with an enormous passage and stairway?!
Best regards,
Mark.
I got off a train from Liverpool yesterday, with astonishing new information that I hope to share as time permits. It included plans of Cunard to refit Olympic by July 1935 for cruising, proving that even Cunard it seems did not see her scrapping at that date as mandatory. I also researched every maintainence cost, from victualling, oil, wages, deck repair, etc. From 1933, Olympic was the cheapest of the Big Six to run except Homeric and possibly Mauretania. I am able to expand even more on my article in my Olympic work which I was really pleased with.
I know that David G. Brown among others has mentioned his belief of the poor design of the Firemen's staircase and tunnel. Yet, in 1911 one expert slated it as being too small!
quote:
'At the forward end of no. #1 boiler room [sic: no. #6] there is a spiral staircase on each side, leading to the firemens' rooms. This we think is a great mistake, as only one man can ascend or descend it at a time, and a broad stairway with landings would have been much better.'
It is from a nautical Cunard observer who, on June 1st 1911, walked aboard and was astonished by the enormous engine room. He had many praises for the machinery and features, but wasn't impressed with the passenger accommodation.
But, assuming the 'flawed design' theory of the tunnel is right, what on earth would have happened with an enormous passage and stairway?!
Best regards,
Mark.