Good evening David! Nice to see you on line again.
We carry on the old 'battle'!
Personally, I think too many researchers and interested parties look for wood instead of trees. Everyone imagines that these sailormen were somehow secretive conniving individuals prone to 'double-speak'. Sure, they were reasonably well educated as far as ordinary people of the times were concerned but intrigue was the domain of the upper classes.
I don't know what you mean by a 'port round theory'.
Boxhall was the only surviving witness to the conversation between Murdoch and Captain Smith and he told the US inquiry of Murdoch's statement: 'I intended to port round it'. Now unless Boxhall was lying..where is the 'theory'?
The support for Boxhall's evidence comes from QM Hitchens' hard-a-starboard helm order.
As for the rotation of the bow while the helm was being applied: The only person who had any sure-fire evidence and a way to measure the amount of heading change was QM Hitchens.. he had a compass card in front of him and nothing else to look at.
To measure amount of turn; the lookouts had the forestay relative to the iceberg and/or perhaps a star or group of stars. The latter only if they had noted them immediately before the helm was applied and that is extremely doubtful since they were watching the berg ahead of the ship.
The 37 second period written about is a red herring which has very limited relevance to the impact v. helm and engine order. There are but three pieces of evidence which are relevant. The evidence of lookouts Fleet and Lee - the evidence of QM Hitchens and the evidence Leading Stoker,Fred Barrett. Combined, they give a turn to impact time of about 7 seconds; meaning that Murdoch gave the helm order when the iceberg was no more than 200 feet ahead of the ship. Something along the following lines:
How do I arrive at this?
If we assume that the helm was mid-ship at the time the helm order came, it would take between 5 an 8 seconds to apply full helm. (believe me, I've done it!) Hitchens stated that he had "barely" got the helm hard over when impact came. Therefore lets' say 7 seconds- helm order to impact. He also inferred that Murdoch gave the engine order at the same time, or nearly the same time as the helm order. Now we have a 7 second period: helm/engine order to impact. Leading Stoker Barrett verified this when he said that the impact came very quickly(7 seconds?)after the boiler room red stop light signal and that they did not even have time to shut all dampers before impact and the water flooded into boiler room 6.
Now what about Fleets' evidence?
As you rightly point out; he was vague if not down-right evasive about the interval between Bells and the ship's head turning. I suspect two reasons for this:
1: The bullying, insensitive method of questioning adopted by his interrogator and:
2: the fact that he felt guilty and worried that he and his partner Leigh waited too long before using the phone to the bridge. Note that the bridge did not call the crow's nest after the bells therefore they did not see what the bells were about until Lee phoned. Or they did so at the same time he did. That was approximately when the ship's head started to turn. Incidentally; how was Lee able to positively identify the black object ahead as an iceberg if he didn't actually see it as such? After all, there were none of the usual, normal identifying signs.. in particular waves breaking round it's base.
My own belief is; the iceberg was relatively small and seen by the lookouts when it was little over 1100 feet ahead of the ship. They were unsure what it was at first because of the calm sea and therefore waited for positive identification. This took about 25-30 seconds. At or near the exact moment they positively identified it as an iceberg; Murdoch also spotted it. By this time, it was a mere 200 feet ahead of the ship... way too late! Murdoch made his turn - attempting to go to port round it. The rest is as they say... history.
JC