Arun Vajpey
Member
Our friend Julian Atkins has mentioned several times in the recent past that in his opinion the Allan liner Parisian, which was on a westbound journey from Glasgow to Halifax & Boston, was in some way culpable in not doing more to try and assist after the Titanic collided with the iceberg, started sinking and sent out distress calls. But I am finding a bit difficult to work this out based on the information available.
Even though the Parisian was not 'standing still' as such, I guess that this is the best heading to post this thread.
The following is what it says on the Titanic Inquiry Project:
On ET there is just a line mentioned:
Of course, there is an article from the Philadelphia Inquirer from 19th April 1912 mentioned on ET: PARISIAN'S WIRELESS EXPERT OFF DUTY WHEN TITANIC STRUCK BERG . But the prefix below perhaps gives an idea how reliable that piece could be.
From Sam's book I worked out that the positions of the "3 icebergs" as reported by the Parisian and then the Californian were based on dead reckoning and could not both be accurate because that would have required the bergs to have drifted 3 miles eastward within 1 hour and 17 minutes, a highly improbable scenario. Unless of course, the two ships were reporting different sets of icebergs.
If they had been the same set of 3 icebergs - and since the bergs would have moved very little in those 77 minutes - Sam reckons that when the Parisian saw them, it was14 miles ahead of the Californian and continuing westward before turning southwest. The Parisian was a marginally faster ship than the Californian and so the distance between them would have increased by the time Captain Lord ordered the latter stopped for the night. It was significantly later that the Titanic sent out its first distress call, and from that it seemed to me that the Parisian would have moved even further south and west from the scene of the disaster and of course the Californian itself.
Is there any evidence that Hains actually "sent" his wireless op Sutherland to bed? During his US Testimony, Captain Lord stated that he had no clear idea about Evans' working hours or even if he had been on duty that Sunday night. Is it possble that Sutherland, being a lone operator like Evans, simply turned in for the night albeit a bit earlier than expected?
Even though the Parisian was not 'standing still' as such, I guess that this is the best heading to post this thread.
In working out the position of the Parisian that night the only decent source that I can find at present is Sam Halpern's Strangers On The Horzon; I don't have Paul Lee's Titanic and the Indifferent Stranger to hand right now. There is surprisingly little on the web about the Parisian, including on ET.I strongly suggest that the Parisian was more than a bit player in all this and potentially as culpable if not more culpable than The Californian.
The following is what it says on the Titanic Inquiry Project:
10:25 p.m., westbound, Glasgow - Halifax - Boston. Transmitter a position call ("50 miles west-southwest") to Titanic that was acknowledged by Titanic. Her radio operator, Sutherland, then went off the air until 8 a.m. April 15.
On ET there is just a line mentioned:
But was it really "in the vicinity" of the disaster?The Parisian, commanded by Captain Hains, was one of the ships in the near vicinity of the Titanic on the night of the disaster.
Of course, there is an article from the Philadelphia Inquirer from 19th April 1912 mentioned on ET: PARISIAN'S WIRELESS EXPERT OFF DUTY WHEN TITANIC STRUCK BERG . But the prefix below perhaps gives an idea how reliable that piece could be.
But for This It Is Believed the Stricken Giant's Cries for Help Would Have Been Heard in Time to Save All
From Sam's book I worked out that the positions of the "3 icebergs" as reported by the Parisian and then the Californian were based on dead reckoning and could not both be accurate because that would have required the bergs to have drifted 3 miles eastward within 1 hour and 17 minutes, a highly improbable scenario. Unless of course, the two ships were reporting different sets of icebergs.
If they had been the same set of 3 icebergs - and since the bergs would have moved very little in those 77 minutes - Sam reckons that when the Parisian saw them, it was14 miles ahead of the Californian and continuing westward before turning southwest. The Parisian was a marginally faster ship than the Californian and so the distance between them would have increased by the time Captain Lord ordered the latter stopped for the night. It was significantly later that the Titanic sent out its first distress call, and from that it seemed to me that the Parisian would have moved even further south and west from the scene of the disaster and of course the Californian itself.
Even if the Parisian had seen those icebergs 'very close' to where the Titanic later collided with one, how would it make the Allan liner culpable? At the time and position that the Parisian saw those bergs, the Titanic was still considerably east of it wlthough as a much faster ship it was closing the distance. From Sam's Fig 11.11 on p288 of his book, it appears like at 9:49pm the Parisian was some 30 miles south (based on the scale within the diagram) of what would later become the Titanic's SOS position. If I understood Sam's reasoning correctly, it was at that point that Captain Hains turned his ship due west once again and it was more than 2 hours later that the Titanic's first distress call was sent out.No one asked Captain Hains why he sent Marconi wireless operator Sutherland to bed early on some very spurious excuse to rescue the Deutschland - that never happened. And had no wireless record of specifically reporting to Titanic anything of skirting round the eastern side of the ice field and warning anyone of this iceberg they encountered at 8pm. Very very close to where Titanic hit it’s iceberg from the now known wreck position.
Is there any evidence that Hains actually "sent" his wireless op Sutherland to bed? During his US Testimony, Captain Lord stated that he had no clear idea about Evans' working hours or even if he had been on duty that Sunday night. Is it possble that Sutherland, being a lone operator like Evans, simply turned in for the night albeit a bit earlier than expected?
Last edited: