>>but wouldnt getting caught in a lie be just as bad if not worse than taking the blaim?<<
Can you say
pur-jur-eee?
I knew you could!
Yeah, getting caught in a blatant lie that couldn't be ignored wouldn't have gone over well and like all the witnesses, Fleet was questioned under oath.
As it stands, I think you can be certain that some of the witnesses weren't the only liars at the inquiries. Lightoller didn't denounce the Mersey Wreck Commission as a "Whitewash" for nothing. In fairness, there were issues of protecting national interests and possibly national security issues as well.
Bad steel or not, think of how it would have been percieved by...say..Germany that Britain's biggest, bestest, most ruggedly built-of-battleship-steel ship had broken up while sinking for no apparant reason. Politicians seldom crunch numbers beyond the superficial and factors such as bending loads imposed on the hull girder greater then any ship could have survived would hardly have been given a single thought.
Having said that, I don't really think Fleet told any lies
per se. What he did was a lot more subtle, and he wasn't the only one doing it. He told the truth as he understood it, but as little as possible, only in response to what he was asked, and no more then that. The Wreck Commission didn't seem to mind.