Dennis Smith
Member
Hi All,
I have just been reading the statements of Capt. Rostron in the American Enquiry - Off the Titanic Explorer Set. During his questioning he was asked the depth of water Titanic had sunk into.
His reply was - Quote "2000 and odd fathoms of water where Titanic sank". He then states that "He looked at his chart".
Fine, if this was a modern day enquiry, we would all accept this as fact (ish), because we have the technology to measure these depths. How did they do it then?? By my calculations 2000 fathoms comes out at approx 2.3 MILES, how the hell did the cartographers of the time work out such figures - even if they were (A bit) wrong. Surely it wasn't just pure guestimation (SP).
Did they use a form of the "Sounding Machine", surely not, over 2 miles of cable supporting its own weight and thin enough to be wound on to a machine and still support its weight?
Parks or anyone give me clue!!
Best Wishes and Rgds
Dennis
I have just been reading the statements of Capt. Rostron in the American Enquiry - Off the Titanic Explorer Set. During his questioning he was asked the depth of water Titanic had sunk into.
His reply was - Quote "2000 and odd fathoms of water where Titanic sank". He then states that "He looked at his chart".
Fine, if this was a modern day enquiry, we would all accept this as fact (ish), because we have the technology to measure these depths. How did they do it then?? By my calculations 2000 fathoms comes out at approx 2.3 MILES, how the hell did the cartographers of the time work out such figures - even if they were (A bit) wrong. Surely it wasn't just pure guestimation (SP).
Did they use a form of the "Sounding Machine", surely not, over 2 miles of cable supporting its own weight and thin enough to be wound on to a machine and still support its weight?
Parks or anyone give me clue!!
Best Wishes and Rgds
Dennis