Mike Spooner
Member
Seeing these new picture images of Titanic. Question is this the same system as used in draining the Oceans documentaries?
One other option. The blades could have been cast bronze, and the hull numbers could have been in the actual molds.The hull numbers were either etched or stamped on. Titanic's propellers were made of bronze metal which have little or no iron, but they can react with oxygen. Which means a green patina aka a film will form on the metal protecting it, from further corrosion.
I've looked again and according to TTSM, Mark Chirnside's excellent article on Titanic's centre propeller and Sam Halpern's "Speed and Revolutions The Development of a Slip Table for the SS Titanic" article (also outstanding research), the propellers were made of manganese bronze. As far as the hull numbers go, I have not come across any further information as to how they were placed, apart from what I posted earlier.One other option. The blades could have been cast bronze, and the hull numbers could have been in the actual molds.
I've looked again and according to TTSM, Mark Chirnside's excellent article on Titanic's centre propeller and Sam Halpern's "Speed and Revolutions The Development of a Slip Table for the SS Titanic" article (also outstanding research), the propellers were made of manganese bronze. As far as the hull numbers go, I have not come across any further information as to how they were placed, apart from what I posted earlier.
There is no clue as to whom the necklace might have belonged to, though the suspicion is that they were travelling in first class. The team at Magellan intend to use artificial intelligence to identify the owner and, if this is successful, will try to contact their relatives.
This process will involve analysing footage of passengers boarding the doomed voyage and examining their clothing to see whether they might have been wearing the necklace. Facial recognition will also be used to identify the person.
The Stern counter appears to be leaning more downwards than it was 12 years ago.
Looks like it's held up by gravity and part of under the mud likely helping metal hold aft stern weight. Bow looks like a ski slope where cranes are.I think the stern looks much worse than in many previous photos. The poop deck area is starting to come down at an alarming angle. I thought that and the engines would be the last recognisable parts of the ship
I never realised just how much the stern was flattened. My mental image of it was always based on Ken Marschall's paintings of it from the late 80's, wherein it still had some vestige of volume to it.
...we have just never seen it so accurately before. Paintings, models, previous photo mosaics even- all are out the window now.