Catherine Ehlers
Guest
I've read various threads of discussion on these message boards regarding what degree of blame belongs to Captain Smith, J. Bruce Ismay, the officer on watch, the Californian, etc. According to accepted views of today's Titanic historians, how much blame, if any, should go to Thomas Andrews? Most theories seem to exonorate him from any real blame. He was a brave man and a real hero the night of the sinking, and it's easy to see that he blamed himself, at least in part, for the disaster. How much of that blame is justified, according to expert opinion? It is true that the watertight bulkheads only came up to E deck, and the rudder was supposed to be too small for so large a ship. Surely as the shipbuilder Andrews should have had some awareness of these things. Or was he aware of them and tried to have them corrected and was overruled? Would you say he is culpable and to what degree?