That's not the case, Jim.
The coal consumption requirements of Olympic and Titanic are very well documented, as is the amount of coal Titanic was supplied with. Using that data and assuming she had been driven at 23 knots for the remainder of the crossing (a higher speed that would entail greater fuel consumption), she would still have had a usable reserve equating to almost two days' steaming at a speed of 21 knots.
This reserve is very much in keeping with J. Bruce Ismay's statement that he believed she would have had about two days' spare consumption.
Hello there Mark, nice to see you are still "up n' 'at 'em".
I based my statement regading coal on the evidence of 3rd Officer Pitman. I quote:
"Senator SMITH: Were you trying to reach 24 knots? A: Mr. PITMAN... No; we had to study the coal. We had not the coal to do it.
Senator SMITH:You had not the coal? A: Mr. PITMAN...No, sir.
Senator FLETCHER: Twenty-one and one-half knots per hour. And you say you had to study the question of coal? What do you mean by that? Did you take account of the amount of coal you had?
Mr. PITMAN: Yes; I understood we had not quite sufficient; there was not sufficient there on board to drive here on at full speed.
Senator FLETCHER: How do you know that?
Mr. PITMAN: I had that from one of the engineers."
Since he was there, he must have had a reason for making that observation.
I know that
Titanic had more than enough coal to get her over to the other side.
Whe using the word "surplus" I meant that they had to be careful with what they
did have. As you probably know, the word "study" as used by Pitman meant they had to be careful how much coal they used. That would have been a wise move considering that the UK National Coal Strike had been settled a mere 4 days before
Titanic sailed from Southampton and there had not been any coal production for the previous 37 days. Although
Titanic had all that coal on board, there was still a world shortage at coaling ports due to vessels bunkering abroad rather than at home.
Significantly, there was a great deal of unrest among American Mine Workers at the same time so perhaps the act of prudence regarding coal consumption was uppermost in the shipping world of April, 1912 and specifically in the minds of Captain Smith and Chief Engineer Bell?
You will be aware of the following UK Government Surveyor's Report issued at Southampton (I think).
"The coal on board is certified to amount to 5,892 tons, which is sufficient to take the ship to her next coaling port."
In fact, the answer to the original question: "How long was the voyage from Queenstown to NYC" is simply that it depends on what speed the ship was averaging over the entire route.