Reports of Flooding in Aft Section

Kindly apologize for this untruth. There are many imposters out there in league with Titanic_Animations out to make me look bad. They even claim I am Logan Dublin University on Discord and YouTube but this isn't true either.


You are not him. The Moderators can track who you are. An easy question. What was the last video that Aaron uploaded to Youtube before he closed his channel? I followed his channel so I know.
 
My God. I am dying of laughter. You two are both obviously Aaron. The way you type, the way you respond. Its not even funny anymore.

What is this obsession with Aaron. I suppose you will be saying you are Aaron as well. Probably why he closed his channel on youtube and left this message board. Too many strange people wanting to be him. I've heard of fans worshipping their idols, but this is getting ridiculous.
 
Why would I have double accounts to talk to myself? That would be lunacy. The last video I had uploaded in regards to the V-break had the very image of Jack Thayer's sketch account of what he saw before my account was hijacked.

I am making a new video in response to my latest findings. May we dispense with these infantile accusations and return to the subject?
 
Why would I have double accounts to talk to myself? That would be lunacy. The last video I had uploaded in regards to the V-break had the very image of Jack Thayer's sketch account of what he saw before my account was hijacked.

Lunacy? I'll tell you what is lunacy. Cherrypicking accounts, ignoring other people's views on the sinking, believing only your theory to be true, and insulting the legacies of people that have passed on.
 
Why would I have double accounts to talk to myself? That would be lunacy. The last video I had uploaded in regards to the V-break had the very image of Jack Thayer's sketch account of what he saw before my account was hijacked.

I am making a new video in response to my latest findings. May we dispense with these infantile accusations and return to the subject?

No it wasn't. It was a 1930's song about Christmas. He stopped showing the Jack Thayer sketch because he said nobody wanted to read the highlight he showed in the newspapers which printed the sketches. Those newspapers said the sketches were shaded in by a Carpathia passenger called Mr. Skidmore after he had received outlines and inscriptions of the sinking by Jack Thayer. People were more obsessed with Skidmore's signature that they did not read the newspaper inscription that clarified Jack Thayer outlined it and described it to Mr. Skidmore, who shaded it in and sent it for publication just as the newspapers that printed the sketches said. That is what he wanted viewers to know because I asked him about it.
 
Lunacy? I'll tell you what is lunacy. Cherrypicking accounts, ignoring other people's views on the sinking, believing only your theory to be true, and insulting the legacies of people that have passed on.

I found the same survivor accounts on Paul Lee's website. Are you suggesting that Paul Lee insulted the legacy of the people that passed on? Don't talk such trash about people. If you can't do the research, then don't talk bad about people who can do proper research. You might not think the survivors were right, but other people do agree with the survivors, and their accounts can be seen on Paul Lee's website.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No it wasn't. It was a 1930's song about Christmas. He stopped showing the Jack Thayer sketch because he said nobody wanted to read the highlight he showed in the newspapers which printed the sketches. Those newspapers said the sketches were shaded in by a Carpathia passenger called Mr. Skidmore after he had received outlines and inscriptions of the sinking by Jack Thayer. People were more obsessed with Skidmore's signature that they did not read the newspaper inscription that clarified Jack Thayer outlined it and described it to Mr. Skidmore, who shaded it in and sent it for publication just as the newspapers that printed the sketches said. That is what he wanted viewers to know because I asked ]
I found the same survivor accounts on Paul Lee's website. Are you suggesting that Paul Lee insulted the legacy of the people that passed on? Don't talk such trash about people. If you can't do the research, then don't talk bad about people who genuinely do research.

Really? On Paul Lee's website it is "blow or buckle upwards." Seems Aaron changed that for some reason. Gee, I wonder why.

And also, to quote your comment above, Jack Thayer denied the Skidmore sketch for the rest of his life. He denied repeatedly making any "outlines." They were all the work of Skidmore. I talked to the Thayer family and they confirmed this.
 
I found the same survivor accounts on Paul Lee's website. Are you suggesting that Paul Lee insulted the legacy of the people that passed on? Don't talk such trash about people. If you can't do the research, then don't talk bad about people who genuinely do research.
As I said before: "No historian acknowledges ,as far I am aware, the bow resurfacing, including Dr. Paul Lee although indeed some of the accounts you mostly used are word for word can be found on his sinking article his end conclusion does not conclude that statement. Some of these talented historians are here on this message board. From the talented Samuel Halpern who along with many other talented historians wrote the book “Report into the loss of the SS Titanic” which looked much deeper into the inquiry including the breakup to the writers of the book “On a sea of glass”, which included a whole appendix with countless accounts regarding to the breakup."
 
No it wasn't. It was a 1930's song about Christmas. He stopped showing the Jack Thayer sketch because he said nobody wanted to read the highlight he showed in the newspapers which printed the sketches. Those newspapers said the sketches were shaded in by a Carpathia passenger called Mr. Skidmore after he had received outlines and inscriptions of the sinking by Jack Thayer. People were more obsessed with Skidmore's signature that they did not read the newspaper inscription that clarified Jack Thayer outlined it and described it to Mr. Skidmore, who shaded it in and sent it for publication just as the newspapers that printed the sketches said. That is what he wanted viewers to know because I asked him about it.


I appreciate your support for my channel Jaden, I remember your grandfather loved my 20's and 30's music videos which I spent a lot of time making. As you can see, I replied as to my last video on the subject of the V-break. You are correct on the video I ultimately posted last before I was hijacked with wrongful copyright strikes by TA's rabid followers. What upsets me is they attacked my channel and me as a whole. I remember you asking me this, and again I continue to show the article as evidence because I stand by what Jack Thayer saw. I fail to understand your scepticism and hostility on my returning. I decided recently I had enough being harassed for my research on the sinking, and that I shouldn't let the mainstream community decide what evidence can and cannot be made public.
 
Last edited:
I appreciate your support for my channel Jaden, I remember your grandfather loved my 20's and 30's music videos which I spent a lot of time making. As you can see, I replied as to my last video on the subject of the V-break. You are correct on the video I ultimately posted last before I was hijacked with wrongful copyright strikes by TA's rabid followers. What upsets me is they attacked my channel and me as a whole. I remember you asking me this, and again I continue to show the article as evidence because I stand by what Jack Thayer saw. I fail to understand your scepticism and hostility on my returning. I decided recently I had enough being harassed for my research on the sinking, and that I shouldn't let the mainstream community decide what evidence can and cannot be made public.

Wrongful copyright strikes? You used a drawing of Titanic without someone's permission. I talked to Matthew Chapman. His diagram of Titanic that you used was copyrighted.
 
Really? On Paul Lee's website it is "blow or buckle upwards." Seems Aaron changed that for some reason. Gee, I wonder why.

And also, to quote your comment above, Jack Thayer denied the Skidmore sketch for the rest of his life. He denied repeatedly making any "outlines." They were all the work of Skidmore. I talked to the Thayer family and they confirmed this.


This is a quote from Jack Thayer's page on Encyclopedia Titanica

"Suddenly the whole superstructure of the ship appeared to split, well forward to midship, and bow or buckle upwards."


I have never seen any proof that Jack Thayer denied the sketches. Nothing. An alleged story that he denied the sketches and a word of mouth from somebody who clearly has a biased opinion against them does not count. You would also have to explain in detail how all of the other survivors who witnessed the bow rise were wrong. It can't be done.

.
 
He stopped showing the Jack Thayer sketch because he said nobody wanted to read the highlight he showed in the newspapers which printed the sketches. Those newspapers said the sketches were shaded in by a Carpathia passenger called Mr. Skidmore after he had received outlines and inscriptions of the sinking by Jack Thayer. People were more obsessed with Skidmore's signature that they did not read the newspaper inscription that clarified Jack Thayer outlined it and described it to Mr. Skidmore, who shaded it in and sent it for publication just as the newspapers that printed the sketches said. That is what he wanted viewers to know because I asked him about it.

The inscription of the newspapers are well known, it were also newspapers which had made up stuff and regarding these drawings had also the claim that Thayer did them while in a boat.
In his 1912 reports there is not only no mention about making these drawings but also the details of the ship sinking do not fit with them.
Maybe you should do some research first before repeating others claims.
 
Wrongful copyright strikes? You used a drawing of Titanic without someone's permission. I talked to Matthew Chapman. His diagram of Titanic that you used was copyrighted.

Mr. Chapman copyright striked my video wrongly and maliciously. I offered even to include him in the credits but he wouldn't remove the strike. I doubt someone so disturbed could have made that diagram. I never saw a copyright on it when I used it to demonstrate the flooding. It was the first image that came up in Google.
 
Back
Top