Ioannis Georgiou
Member
Hi Adam,
that Beesley was an academic does not mean that he was right with everything.
The main problem is that in his book he has some facts different as in his letter he wrote on board Carpathia directly after the sinking. There for example is no mention that he looked over the side to see a white foam also not the visit to a bath room with the 2 ladies and several more.
Beesley like other survivors "corrected" himself (in his first version he had the starboard and port side wrong) and may have add additional stuff. This was also done by other survivors as Archibald Gracie and Clear Cameron for example.
I don't see any miscommunication between the bridge and engine room. The only communication was via the engine telegraph which according to Olliver was operated by Captain Smith after the collision. There are several other survivors who mentioned that the engines stopped, then went on again and stopped finally.
But I agree, the real reason is only known by those who did not survive.
that Beesley was an academic does not mean that he was right with everything.
The main problem is that in his book he has some facts different as in his letter he wrote on board Carpathia directly after the sinking. There for example is no mention that he looked over the side to see a white foam also not the visit to a bath room with the 2 ladies and several more.
Beesley like other survivors "corrected" himself (in his first version he had the starboard and port side wrong) and may have add additional stuff. This was also done by other survivors as Archibald Gracie and Clear Cameron for example.
I don't see any miscommunication between the bridge and engine room. The only communication was via the engine telegraph which according to Olliver was operated by Captain Smith after the collision. There are several other survivors who mentioned that the engines stopped, then went on again and stopped finally.
But I agree, the real reason is only known by those who did not survive.