Noel F. Jones
Member
According to The Shipbuilder (reprint), page 19:
The keel of each vessel is formed by a single thickness of plating 1-1/2 inch thick and a flat bar 19-1/2 inches wide by 3 inches thick
Fig.15 looking down-slip (apparently) shows a hydraulic riveter working on a fabricated I-beam periodically reinforced with angle beam. There are no lightening holes in evidence.
Fig.23 in contrast is a more distant view, looking up-slip (apparently), of (apparently) the same member and in which vertically aspected oval lightening holes are very evident.
I find it unclear as to where these views were in relation to the vessel's length but these disparities suggest the I-beam was lightened over some considerable portion of its length, probably towards the extremities of the vessel - or would this be inconsistent with the fulfilment of the 'equivalent girder'?
Furthermore, the engine elevations show an augment of height in way of the engine beds.
Noel
The keel of each vessel is formed by a single thickness of plating 1-1/2 inch thick and a flat bar 19-1/2 inches wide by 3 inches thick
Fig.15 looking down-slip (apparently) shows a hydraulic riveter working on a fabricated I-beam periodically reinforced with angle beam. There are no lightening holes in evidence.
Fig.23 in contrast is a more distant view, looking up-slip (apparently), of (apparently) the same member and in which vertically aspected oval lightening holes are very evident.
I find it unclear as to where these views were in relation to the vessel's length but these disparities suggest the I-beam was lightened over some considerable portion of its length, probably towards the extremities of the vessel - or would this be inconsistent with the fulfilment of the 'equivalent girder'?
Furthermore, the engine elevations show an augment of height in way of the engine beds.
Noel