>>It is something I have been wondering about after hearing the theory that reversing the engines might have decreased rudder effectiveness- whether there was time to actually reverse them-<<
Understandable. With no propwash over the rudder, it's effectiveness would have gone down. Unavoidable really. I had a turn at the helm of the USS Comstock and near the end of that watch, the OOD ordered the engines reversed. I lost steerage way while the ship was still doing 17 knots.
It may well be a moot point anyway since the evidence would tend to indicate that no engine reversal took place until after the Titanic's encounter with the iceberg.
>>I had not considered the people aspect, only physically stopping and reversing the engines, but what you said makes sense.<<
Thanks. It's easy enough today to overlook the fact that everything then was completely manual. There was no direct control of the engines from the bridge. When you have to send orders down by a telegraph and people have to turn to in order to make it happen, things start to take more time then you would like.