Michael Gibbs wrote:
>I have respect for any books you may write, but don't you think that
>most or all of these many 'premonitions' that survivors or relatives
>seem to of had are nothing more than falsehoods, exaggerations or down
>right lies?
Hi, Michael!
Your question has a number of facets, so I'll answer these facets one at a time.
Do I believe that most or all of these premonitions were not true psychic phenomena? It's quite possible that many -- or even most -- of these accounts were merely the results of coincidence, and my books try to point out as many examples of this as possible.
Do I believe that these accounts were falsehoods or downright lies? Yes, a few of them were, and my books present as much historical information as possible in order to demonstrate which of these people were deliberately trying to pull the wool over our eyes. (E.g. I was able to prove that one lady who claimed to be a reincarnated Titanic passenger had thoroughly researched that passenger before she went public with her claim.)
Re: other cases, the historical documentation I was able to gather together suggested that there may have been non-psychic reasons for certain (honest) people to have felt uneasy about the Titanic (e.g. a widely held superstition about maiden voyages in general, fear of the water, etc.)
Do I believe that many of these accounts were the result of later exaggeration? Undoubtedly.
Do I believe that *all* of these accounts were non-psychic in nature? I honestly don't know. I'm a skeptic in the classical sense of the word and try to keep an open mind on subjects like this, since people who close their minds *completely* to such possibilities are not being skeptical -- they're pretending to be omniscient.
>I mean, the Titanic tragedy is a fantastic story, having 'premonitions'
>about it happening beforehand, make for even better storytelling, right!
Quite true.
>After all, It's easy to say "Ooh, I had a premonition that that great
>ship was going to sink when I boarded it at Southampton" after the
>event, when you have the gift of hindsight.
True, but that doesn't explain the premonitions that people spoke about *before* the ship went down. A number of financially hard-pressed crewmen went down to the Southampton docks on April 10th in order to sign onto the Titanic -- only to return home without doing so (and without any much-needed money) because of a sudden feeling of dread that came over them when they were about to board the ship. Mrs. Bucknell had a similar long-term feeling of dread and repeatedly told her shipboard companions that she was convinced something ghastly was going to happen to the Titanic before the vessel reached New York. Major Butt was so certain that he would soon be "at the center of some awful calamity" that he made out his will right before he sailed. A friend of Henry Harris was so certain that Harris faced danger on the Titanic that he cabled Harris from New York and urged his friend not to sail. T.W.S. Brown's face suddenly went white as he and his family were about to board the Titanic, and that evening he told his wife that "something is going to happen." Mrs. Hanson was so certain the ship would sink that she described (to her family) the type of funeral she wanted to have in the event that her body was recovered. Eugene Daly repeatedly insisted to his shipboard friends that the Titanic would never reach America; just before he went to bed on April 14th he told them that the Titanic was going to sink *that night.*
These events (and many others) took place *before* the Titanic went down. Could they have been the result of mere coincidence? Sure. *Were* they the result of mere coincidence? I don't know -- and I don't think anyone else does either.
>No disrespect to you George, I guess I'm just a cynical skeptic...
I understand completely, old chap, and there's nothing wrong with being a doubting Thomas. If you'll read my books (blatant plug)
![Smile :) :)]()
you'll see that I've postulated what I consider to be reasonable non-psychic explanations for as many of these accounts as I was able to. (In fact, the first two chapters of my first book are called "The Curious Coincidences" and "Mistaken Accounts and Deliberate Hoaxes." I'm much more skeptical of psychic phenomena today than I was a few years ago, but some of the accounts in my books still manage to raise the hairs on the back of my neck and make me wonder if we really know as much about our world as we think we know.
At the very least, though, the accounts present interesting sidelights on the frame of mind that possessed many Titanic passengers and their familes in the days prior to (as well as during and after) the maiden voyage.
All my best,
George