Hi, Joao and Trevor:
I should clarify that the necklace Noelle Rothes wore was composed of 300 year old pearls —— I’m sure it had been restrung!
As to whether the necklace is still in existence. I have no idea. I’m sure it is somewhere; I’m just not sure if it’s still in her family’s possession. When interviewing the late Ian Rothes, the countess’ grandson, some time ago, he didn’t mention it. I only found out about it recently while researching. It was a widely syndicated news item in 1918.
Regarding the countess’ personality. You’ll be able to read more about that in the article I submitted here to ET. It was handed in a while ago, and will be available sometime in the near future. But first, let me say that women of the upper classes were increasingly active and not just ornamental figures by 1912. Noelle was no exception, being much involved in charities and public welfare work.
Noelle was reserved, soft-spoken and charming, but also very determined in her personal and political views and outlook, which were fairly conservative. Noelle was actually bourgeois in her attitude, maybe even a bit pious, as family and church were extremely important to her. The countess made a career of good works —— a real-life "Lady Bountiful." She was motivational in her manner, bringing her quiet spirit of encouragement to her work with the needy — from the poor in her village (Leslie Township) to the soldiers and refugees she nursed during WWI.
Noelle and her husband were popular members of "high society," yet they didn’t indulge in the amoral, decadent lifestyle of other Edwardian aristocrats, being more domestic in their interests and tastes than was fashionable at the time. Noelle wasn’t a suffragette, though she was obviously a progressive woman in her own way. She rarely spoke in public at the political meetings she helped organize, and was not a "celebrity" in the modern sense (until the Titanic came along!).
Randy