Michael H. Standart
Member
I may be mistaken, but I think that "Trust" in the business sense had a rather different meaning then what our understanding of such would be today.
As to the courts speaking, the one in Virginia is the one overseeing the matter...and it is acting in accords to existing maritime and international law and agreements. Again, I'll have to defer to a qualified attorney on this, and I hope one or more who are members of this board will speak up and clarify things. (Joe Shomie, where are you?)
As to continuing ownership and salvage rights, that much holds up only as long as the lawful salvor-in-posession (In this case, RMS Titanic Inc.) continues with salvage operations of some kind. If they lose interest, or go belly up, the titanic becomes fair game for some new contenders. Not the most comforting thought when you mull it over for a spell. RMS Titanic isn't much loved by everybody here,(There are doubtless a few exceptions) but would a new comer be an improvement?
Probably not.
Cordially,
Michael H. Standart
As to the courts speaking, the one in Virginia is the one overseeing the matter...and it is acting in accords to existing maritime and international law and agreements. Again, I'll have to defer to a qualified attorney on this, and I hope one or more who are members of this board will speak up and clarify things. (Joe Shomie, where are you?)
As to continuing ownership and salvage rights, that much holds up only as long as the lawful salvor-in-posession (In this case, RMS Titanic Inc.) continues with salvage operations of some kind. If they lose interest, or go belly up, the titanic becomes fair game for some new contenders. Not the most comforting thought when you mull it over for a spell. RMS Titanic isn't much loved by everybody here,(There are doubtless a few exceptions) but would a new comer be an improvement?
Probably not.
Cordially,
Michael H. Standart