Scott: In answer to your first question, an experienced ship handler once wrote, “To avoid or minimize contact damage should an iceberg, for example, be encountered unexpectedly at close quarters, the rudder must be put hard over away from the iceberg. The engine speed must be increased, if not already at full speed ahead. The instant the bow clears or hits the iceberg, the rudder must be put hard over the other way and the engine speed maintained. This is vital in preventing the hull abaft the pivot point from striking the iceberg.” I’m sure Jim will have something quite different to say
Samuel,
Bare with me here as I am having some difficulty understanding this.
1. So in the scenario that we have Murdoch sees the iceberg either right before, just as, or immediately after the 3 bells. I think we can all agree that it was before Fleet actually phones the bridge. Correct?
2. It takes some amount of time for Murdoch to react. In the most recent book you've edited I believe Tad argues (I actually could be remembering a post here and not the book!) that Murdoch, having identified the obstacle must now wait to get a baring on the berg, as it if he acts to soon and he's going to actually miss the object, he can inadvertently cause a collision. I believe its argued that he was in just this situations some time prior to Titanic and avoided collision by doing nothing.
In any case, depending on who is doing the telling this delay is as little as 17 seconds or closer to 40 (did David argue several minutes?)
3. When Murdoch determines that the ship
will collide with the berg, he orders the helm hard over to the starboard, or a hard over turn to port. This choice may be because the berg is more right then left, or it may be because Murdoch knows that Titanic is a bit faster in a port turn.
Okay so far?
One question though that might be a digression. Assuming that Lightoller's granddaughter isn't correct regarding her story, how long does it take Hitchen's to put the helm hard over? Could this (the time he takes to respond and get the wheel over) be affected at all by the fact that this was his first voyage on a large ship and it was his first sailing with White Star Line?
4. Getting back to it: The wheel is hard over to starboard (port turn) and Titanic's bow begins to move, it moves two points, correct? Is this accurate up to here? Because this is where I get confused.
5. The full astern order was never given (again I think we all agree on that).
Now according to Jim, this is the last helm order given until the berg is no longer in contact with the ship. Correct? What I am having a hard time understanding is this (and I still don't think I've gotten a concrete answer, well at least one that I can understand!
![Wink ;) ;)]()
):
Having read the introduction to David's "Last Log of the Titanic," I find myself wondering how a port only turn that results in a glancing blow along the starboard side of the ship can result in anything other than damage down the entire length of the ship. Particularly given that no hard over port (turn to starboard) order is given until contact ceases?
Jim argues that the force of the collision actually causes the berg to move (Jim yell at me if this is wrong) away from the ship; However, it seems to me that if penetrating contact is being made with Titanic by the berg, as in pieces of ice are actually sticking into Titanic's hull as she passes, that the tendency would be for the berg to not be moving away very quickly due to the type of friction being caused.
I think this should be doubly true if there is any substance to the grounding theory. If Titanic is riding over an underwater ice shelf (take this with a grain of salt as I know nothing about engineering) the weight of Titanic acting on the berg's underwater bits should tilt the berg
towards Titanic's starboard side, not push it away.
Furthermore, it seems that once grounding contact is made the tendency would be for the ships momentum to carry the whole length of the ship over the ice spur
unless something was done to swing the stern out of the way.
Am I just completely off base about this?
The other thing I am wondering is, taken your original quoted comments above, how is this necessarily incompatible with a hard-a-port turn after contact has been made? You are Murdoch, you hear and feel contact with the side, but you know the blow is glancing as said contact does not
feel very significant. You also note probably pretty quickly that your course and speed, i.e. your control over the ship, has not altered since contact begins. Therefore would it not be in the realm of possibility to try to throw the wheel hard over to port to try and clear the stern?
Also, and I know this is the bit where Oliver's testimony becomes important, is it not plausible (let's ignore testimony just for a moment here) that the port turn appears to have worked (I believe this is actually what David argues in "Last Log") in as much as the bow is clear of the visible portion of the iceberg, so the starboard turn order is given to clear the stern. Unfortunately in this scenario, the starboard bow makes contact with the underwater portion of the berg, but the helm orders succeed in clearing the stern?
Jim believes that the ‘hard-aport’ order came after Smith arrived on the bridge to put the ship back on her course for NY, when Smith telegraphed down ½ ahead to the engine room.
I don’t think that was the case, and certainly getting the ship back on course for NY was not the immediate priority.
I agree that something like this occurred, and I am of the opinion that I know some here share, and some don't, that forward momentum
after the collision was kept up for at least 10 minutes. I find a more compelling scenario, however, is that Smith acting on input from Ismay and preliminary damage reports was making way towards Halifax, not New York.
As it is pretty clear from my own reading of the evidence (and as is argued by Tad and one other--sorry I don't remember your name off the top of my head!) that Smith knew pretty quickly Titanic was seriously damaged, but importantly
not that the ship was foundering until maybe 30-45 minutes after the collision.
Given that, what makes the most sense is Halifax as the closest port with the infrastructure to handle a damaged Titanic and her passengers.
And given that reading part of David's book got my blood up about this when he argues that there is circumstantial evidence that suggests the "everyone safe and heading to Halifax" news report came from White Star Boston and by extention Titanic herself.