Apparently I missed this thread when it started, but I'd just like to inject my own sentiments here. George's monograph really is first-rate -- original, exciting, and exceptionally well-researched. It's only a shame it's often hard to find.
I agree that the secondary nature of *some* of the sources does muddy the water a little. But I think George did an excellent job of selecting and editing his materials according to general reliability. And, true to form, Behe doesn't ram anything down the reader's throat; he merely presents his evidence and elaborates on what it may well suggest -- an admirably scholarly trait.
The funniest thing about "T:S,S,&S" is that when I first got it (from Amazon), I was disheartened by its slender size. But that thought never recurred *after* I'd read it. It's really quite a treasure.
Cheers,
John