Mark Baber
RIP
I'm quite frankly puzzled by why this is such an issue. IMM ships had begun being equipped with wireless equipment as early as 1905 and I don't see anything surprising, let alone sinister, in Californian's being so equipped.
Neither do I. I too agree with Mark.I don’t understand Mike’s posts 29 and 30 above.
April 1st. I get it.know many will be skeptical, but it is not a crazy theory, and actually makes the most sense when you take a hard, unbiased look at the evidence.
“General cargo” is what the Boston Press via Reade and Paul Slish said it had on that crossing from London to Boston.
No one has actually looked for the ‘manifest’ in any archives in Boston. Paul Slish said he might do so some years ago. I certainly haven’t, as I have never been to the USA. The London record of the cargo for that voyage doesn’t appear on any searches I have done online of The Public Records Office at Kew.
It was not unusual for The Californian to go from London instead of Liverpool, and London had a regular steaming of a Leyland Line vessel to Boston. Though on this occasion it was the first time The Californian had left London for Boston and with Captain Lord as it’s Captain.
You can bet and do your smell tests but you need evidence to back up all these claimsI would bet a lot of hollow items so that contraband could be hidden inside. Like a load of ceramic statutes of King Albert, which you break open like a pinata to get the opium or stolen jewels out. Why else bother sailing that rusty old clunker all the way to the USA when coal was expensive and hard to get. In a time when you could barely scrounge coal enough to get mega-important high rollers on Titanic across, you're going to sail some rusty old boat full of lumber or whatever? Doesn't pass the smell test to me.
First of all, you're reading way too much into this. Second, IMM did not regulate the use of wireless aboard their vessels; it was covered under the Wireless Ship Act which was signed at the 1906 Berlin Convention and did not pass any regulatory laws, until June 1910. It stated "SEC. 1. That from and after the first day of July, nineteen hundred and eleven, it shall be unlawful for any ocean-going steamer of the United States, or of any foreign country, carrying passengers and carrying fifty or more persons, including passengers or crew, to leave or attempt to leave any port of the United States unless such steamer shall be equipped with an efficient apparatus for radio-communication, in good working order, in charge of a person skilled in the use of such apparatus, which apparatus shall be capable of transmitting and receiving messages over a distance of at least one hundred miles, night or day: Provided, That the provisions of this Act shall not apply to steamers plying only between ports less than two hundred miles apart."If ships under the IMM banner have decided to fit wireless unit from 1905 on that is purely a private matter to meat the completion head on. It was not Government regulation or for safety. If was for safety why did it take six years to do so. So why did captain Lord need a wireless when sailing ships for years without a wireless. It was the company policy to have one and not the captain.
Just a matter of interest are there any written rules set by IMM for the purpose of a wireless on board?