Based on David's post above, what we have is the following string of events:
David said: "The 10 o'clock setback I suggest allows the extra 47 minutes to be split evenly between Second Officer
Lightoller and First Officer Murdoch. It also properly exempts Chief Officer Wilde from any extra time on duty."
As shown in the above timeline, that indeed would be the case. However, there are three things that I must point out as to why I must disagree with this proposed timeline of events:
1. Setting the clock back at 10pm by 24 minutes would indeed add 24 minutes of extra time to 2/O
Lightoller's watch on deck, which was from 6 to 10pm. However, it would have also added 24 minutes of time to the lookouts who were on duty at that time, which were Symons and Jewell. But we know from Fleet that he and Lee expected about twenty minutes extra time up in the nest during their watch, which was from 10 to 12. According to David's scenario, that would not happen.
2. QM
Robert Hichens was the standby QM on duty while Lightolller was still the OOW. Hichens was the one who called upon 1/O Murdoch at quarter to 10 to inform him that he was due on deck in 15 minutes time to replace Lightoller. Hichens then had other duties to perform as standby before taking his trick at the wheel, including calling up and getting the taffrail log reading from QM Rowe who was out on the poop "at half a minute to ten, as near as I can tell." At 10pm, 4 bells, Hichens took the wheel from QM Olliver (who became the standby), Murdock replaced Lightoller as OOW, and Fleet and Lee replaced Symons and Jewell in the nest. According to Hichens, he was at the wheel "One hour and forty minutes" when the accident happened. By the way, according to Hichens, the advance of the ship by log from 8pm to 10pm was 45 miles, consistent with an interval of 2 hours, not 2 hours and 24 minutes.
3. Lightoller specifically said that 4/O
Boxhall was to have more than two hours remaining on duty after he, Lightoller, went off duty because of the clock change. That could only happen if the clock change occurred after Lightoller was replaced by 1/O Murdoch at 4 bells.
David also noted: "the uniformity of 11:40 p.m. as the time of the accident as noted by both crew and passengers. In theory, there should be a 23 or 24 minute difference between the two no matter when the crew clocks were retarded."
I fully agree with this observation.
David also said: "The obvious answer is that both the crew and passenger clocks were showing the same time — 11:40 p.m. No other possibility exists for people quoting the same time for the same singular event other than that all of their various clocks were showing the same time."
Again, I fully agree with this statement.
However, David referred to these observations as "next big horologic problem for Titanic historians" which I happen to disagree with. It is only a problem for historians who believe that clocks were put back before the accident happened.